Bremuda triangle :: essays research papers

What Mr Cherry is saying is WI something generally held to be untrue> is genuinely true? This is not alternative history because the existence> or otherwise of the Bermuda Triangle did not follow from a chain of> historical acts by charitable organisms.     No. What I was saying is "what if this thing, generally held untrue, is not nevertheless true, but intruded on a historical event, as described afterwards."> OK, David. Whats the PoD? What is the decision institutionalise where history> could have gone one way or the other and some woman or man makes a> decision and... the Bermuda Triangle comes into being?     The PoD is not the bermuda triangle, but its effect on Columbus ships as theyreturned I used the bermuda triangle only as the vehicle for the PoD.> " unavowed history" involves the revealing that something that we think> we know about the past is untrue. It is not alternate history it> leaves history unchanged,      Note, history DID change. Hence not secret history, even if it did invokesomething less-than-scientifically sound. Secret History involves therevelation that something we think we know about the past is untrue... what Idid was -not- that.> So how is history changed to bring the Bermuda Triangle into being?> Really the PoD office just as easily be WI terrifying ASBs sink the Nina> and Pinta? Tacky.     There are those out there who believes it does exist. I made the suppositionthat it existed for the purpose of the divergence. The only PoD is "what if thebermuda triangle effect managed to get Columbus on the way back from LaNavidad." If you dont want to believe that the bermuda triangle is an actualoccurrence, that doesnt make those who DO believe it any less likely to believeit. > If we are dealing with alternative history rather than fantasy then